Originally Posted on March 11, 2012
\
I began my experiment by gathering my
materials. My materials are a toy car,
ruler, 1 x 4 board, tin box and books.
My hypothesis was that the greater slope and mass would cause my tin box
to move the furthest. I set my books at
a height of 20 and 35 cm to create the varying slopes. I used quarters to add mass to my car. I first completed each experiment with no
added mass. Then I added a quarter for
each experiment. I completed three
trails each time I added mass. I
continued this when I increased the slope.
The results of my experiment are as follows:
|
20 cm height of slope
|
Trail 1
|
Trail 2
|
Trail 3
|
|
No mass added to car
|
3.5 cm
|
4.5 cm
|
4 cm
|
|
One quarter added
|
5.5 cm
|
6.cm
|
5 cm
|
|
Two quarters added
|
8cm
|
7.5 cm
|
7.5 cm
|
|
Three quarter added
|
8.5 cm
|
9 cm
|
8 cm
|
|
35 cm height of slope
|
Trail 1
|
Trail 2
|
Trail 3
|
|
No mass added to car
|
9 cm
|
9 cm
|
8.5 cm
|
|
One quarter added
|
11 cm
|
11.5 cm
|
12 cm
|
|
Two quarters added
|
12.5 cm
|
12 cm
|
13 cm
|
|
Three quarters added
|
14 cm
|
13.5 cm
|
13 cm
|
The results of my experiment confirm my
hypothesis that the increased slope and mass would cause the tin box to move
the furthest. Tillery, Enger & Ross
(2008) states, it takes longer to stop
something, when it has more momentum.
The increase in the slope and mass caused the car to gain more momentum
as it traveled down the slope. The
students in Ms. Blight’s class realized that momentum increases with mass. However, from my observations, I found that slope
has a greater effect than mass. When the
slope is increased in addition to the mass, the distance the tin box traveled
was almost double.
If I were to conduct this experiment in my
class, I would have the students change the mass of the tin box I used in my experiment. The mass of the tin box I used was slightly
greater than my car even with the added quarters. I would have the students choose an item with
an equal mass and then a much greater mass.
The students could then further test Newton’s third law of motion,
“whenever two object interact, the force exerted on one object is equal in
strength and opposite in direction to the force exerted on the other object”
(Tillery, Enger, & Ross, 2008).
There are so many possibilities with this experiment. The greatest lesson I learned from this
inquiry is the importance of conducting inquiry lessons in the classroom. Just reading Newton’s laws of motion and
watching videos are not a substitute for hands on inquiry. Inquiry lessons provide students the
opportunity to move toward a deeper understanding of science (Branch &
Bell, 2010). Inquiry lessons answer
questions and allow for discovery among students. Long (2011) states that inquiry lessons allow
students to take ownership for their problems they create, or the discoveries
that they make. In other words, science without inquiry is not complete
understanding.
References
Banchi,
H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science &
Children, 46(2), 26–29.
Laureate
Education Inc. (Producer). (2012) Newton’s Amusement Land: Race Track. Retrieved from http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com
Long, C.M. (2011). Designing
inquiry oriented science lab activities.
Middle School Journal. Vol.
43, Issue 1, p. 6-15.

